|
|
Post by Matt10 on Apr 16, 2015 19:07:27 GMT -6
This is what I am working towards. Would love to know anyone's thoughts before it is implemented. Thanks.  |
|
|
|
Post by smoknpirate on Apr 16, 2015 21:20:12 GMT -6
Without having any knowledge as to how the real tours do it I think that looks good to me. I like the idea of rewarding points for completing tournaments.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt10 on Apr 16, 2015 23:29:42 GMT -6
Without having any knowledge as to how the real tours do it I think that looks good to me. I like the idea of rewarding points for completing tournaments. Yeah, I like the idea of rewarding completed tournaments as well. I do plan on putting another twist/feature - but want to settle into this format first. As I have researched, the cuts made and top 10, etc - play a role in "real" tours, but since the cuts made doesn't apply, I figured I'd keep it simple. |
|
|
|
Post by smiffylfc79 on Apr 17, 2015 0:55:04 GMT -6
Sorry Matt10, I must say I don't like it as it says I am 8th  , surely that is wrong  , shouldn't I be higher?  , No seriously looks good mate, well done.  |
|
|
|
Post by trex187 on Apr 17, 2015 6:20:16 GMT -6
Looks good to me. Nice job!
|
|
justamush
RGT Board - Tour Direction
Posts: 172 
|
Post by justamush on Apr 17, 2015 6:33:28 GMT -6
I like it!
|
|
|
|
Post by bigcat50 on Apr 17, 2015 8:42:47 GMT -6
I like it as well, what about maybe a bonus point for low round of the week as well?
|
|
|
|
Post by chrashbird on Apr 17, 2015 9:05:01 GMT -6
Looks good, except for being under Andi Bonus point for low round would be good, how about a bonus point for biggest differential for improved score in the 3rd round compared to rounds 1 and 2 for those that don't finish in the money or outside the top 10? Might give the guys who are mid and low pack of the leaderboard something to play for? Reward someone who shoots 81 in rounds 1 and 2 and manages to score 74 in the last round? |
|
|
|
Post by smiffylfc79 on Apr 17, 2015 11:20:40 GMT -6
Looks good, except for being under Andi Bonus point for low round would be good, how about a bonus point for biggest differential for improved score in the 3rd round compared to rounds 1 and 2 for those that don't finish in the money or outside the top 10? Might give the guys who are mid and low pack of the leaderboard something to play for? Reward someone who shoots 81 in rounds 1 and 2 and manages to score 74 in the last round? Where you should be, lol,
Also like the idea of trying to get all competitors who compete something to play for. 
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt10 on Apr 17, 2015 15:50:43 GMT -6
Looks good, except for being under Andi Bonus point for low round would be good, how about a bonus point for biggest differential for improved score in the 3rd round compared to rounds 1 and 2 for those that don't finish in the money or outside the top 10? Might give the guys who are mid and low pack of the leaderboard something to play for? Reward someone who shoots 81 in rounds 1 and 2 and manages to score 74 in the last round? I think we could definitely work that out. Bear in mind EVERYTHING related to the site is done in google sheets/excel - so formula heavy, and I'm not the best at it. I think this one could be easier, it would be simply the sum of 2 columns (Rd 1 and Rd2) subtracted by the difference of column that holds the Rd3. I can do "if >10" then "2 pts" or something. Make sense? lol |
|
|
|
Post by Matt10 on Apr 17, 2015 17:27:57 GMT -6
Okay, here is what I'm working with - and it will be applied to past tournaments and those going forward. The Money list link within the site will include the final standings and an column that shows "RGT Points" (our Fedex points). I will also include a link within the table that will direct to the breakdown of the points origin.
Thanks everyone for their input, think this will be quite enjoyable. I will make an announcement shortly after I test it within final standing tables, etc.
Reg. Winner - 100 pts
Major Winner - 200 pts
2nd Place - 50 Pts
Major 2nd - 100 pts
3rd Place - 30 pts
Major 3rd - 60 pts
4th-10th - 10 pts
Major 4th-10th - 40 pts
In the Money - 5 pts
Low ROTW - 4 pts
3rd Rd Push (only outside Top10) - 3 pts
All rounds Complete - 3 pts
|
|
|
|
Post by trowelhead on Apr 19, 2015 3:58:58 GMT -6
Personally i think the gaps are too far apart ,you cud easily find sum1 running away with the yr only a few weeks in . Say win 100 2nd 80 3rd 65 4th 50 and reward to 10th the rest is grt . Eg a player wins 4 events thats 400 another comes 4th 4x thats 40 pts uncatchable lead imo
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt10 on Apr 19, 2015 16:30:33 GMT -6
Personally i think the gaps are too far apart ,you cud easily find sum1 running away with the yr only a few weeks in . Say win 100 2nd 80 3rd 65 4th 50 and reward to 10th the rest is grt . Eg a player wins 4 events thats 400 another comes 4th 4x thats 40 pts uncatchable lead imo Taking it into consideration, I'm working on the past leaderboards now. Here is the adjustment from my previous post.  |
|
|
|
Post by Matt10 on Apr 27, 2015 19:13:15 GMT -6
I wanted to add regarding the Low ROTW, if the round score is tied among players, the score that is in the latest round (so Round 3 would win out) will be taken into consideration. If it goes beyond that (both players low round in rd 3), then the player with the higher finish will win out. If both players are tied, then no player will win out and both players will be awarded with the Low ROTW 5 pts.
Make sense?
|
|
|
|
Post by blackaces13 on May 26, 2015 6:05:27 GMT -6
With about 25 players finishing at this point, it seems like 4-10 getting the same points is a bit of a wide range.
Using last week as an example, I finished T4 (-15) and received the same amount of points as a player who shot -4 and finished in 10th out of the 24 players who completed 3 rounds.
If we had 100+ player fields I could see lumping in 4-10, but as it stands there is too large of a performance gap between 4th and 10th place to warrant equal points IMO.
|
|
, surely that is wrong 
, shouldn't I be higher? 
, No seriously looks good mate, well done. 
Oct 3, 2015 5:11:33 GMT -6